If you say that “you can proof anything with reasonable arguments”, and if you
don’t accept circular arguments as valid, how can you reasonable say that “you
can proof anything with reasonable arguments”.
In other
words: how can you reasonably proof reason? If you don’t accept circular
arguments.
At some
point you would have to denied this non circular arguments principle. And
accept that the only thing to be denied is that which does not have sense to
be. Or you will
have to think about reason as something more fundamental, as a synonym of being
or living.
Then you will
more synchronize with the truth or you will reason farther by using this word
reason as it ought to be use. Or by not denying that which ought to be denied. By
recognizing the truth, you can recognize the truth or use the truth. In a more
fundamental way you are the truth.
